METLIFE INC | 2013 | FY |

8. Investments

See Note 10 for information about the fair value hierarchy for investments and the related valuation methodologies.

Investment Risks and Uncertainties

Investments are exposed to the following primary sources of risk: credit, interest rate, liquidity, market valuation, currency and real estate risk. The financial statement risks, stemming from such investment risks, are those associated with the determination of estimated fair values, the diminished ability to sell certain investments in times of strained market conditions, the recognition of impairments, the recognition of income on certain investments and the potential consolidation of VIEs. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs relating to these financial statement risks may have a material effect on the amounts presented within the consolidated financial statements.

The determination of valuation allowances and impairments is highly subjective and is based upon periodic evaluations and assessments of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.

The recognition of income on certain investments (e.g. structured securities, including mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities (“ABS”), certain structured investment transactions and FVO and trading securities) is dependent upon certain factors such as prepayments and defaults, and changes in such factors could result in changes in amounts to be earned.

Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS

Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS by Sector

The following table presents the fixed maturity and equity securities AFS by sector. Redeemable preferred stock is reported within U.S. corporate and foreign corporate fixed maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock is reported within equity securities. Included within fixed maturity securities are structured securities including RMBS, commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and ABS.



	December 31, 2013										December 31, 2012
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized						Estimated Fair Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized							Estimated Fair Value
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gains		Temporary Losses		OTTI Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Gains		Temporary Losses		OTTI Losses			Estimated Fair Value
									(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. corporate	$	100,203	$	7,495	$	1,229	$	—	$	106,469	$	102,669	$	11,887	$	430	$	—		$	114,126
Foreign corporate (1)	59,778		3,939		565		—		63,152		61,806		5,654		277		(1		)	67,184
Foreign government	50,717		4,107		387		—		54,437		51,967		5,440		71		—			57,336
U.S. Treasury and agency	43,928		2,251		1,056		—		45,123		41,874		6,104		11		—			47,967
RMBS	34,167		1,584		490		206		35,055		35,666		2,477		315		349			37,479
CMBS	16,115		605		170		—		16,550		18,177		1,009		57		—			19,129
ABS	15,458		296		171		12		15,571		15,762		404		156		13			15,997
State and political subdivision	13,233		903		306		—		13,830		12,949		2,169		70		—			15,048
Total fixed maturity securities	$	333,599	$	21,180	$	4,374	$	218	$	350,187	$	340,870	$	35,144	$	1,387	$	361		$	374,266
Equity securities
Common stock	$	1,927	$	431	$	5	$	—	$	2,353	$	2,034	$	147	$	19	$	—		$	2,162
Non-redeemable preferred stock	1,085		76		112		—		1,049		804		65		140		—			729
Total equity securities	$	3,012	$	507	$	117	$	—	$	3,402	$	2,838	$	212	$	159	$	—		$	2,891

______________


(1)	The noncredit loss component of OTTI losses for foreign corporate securities was in an unrealized gain position of $1 million at December 31, 2012, due to increases in estimated fair value subsequent to initial recognition of noncredit losses on such securities. See also “— Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses).”

The Company held non-income producing fixed maturity securities with an estimated fair value of $74 million and $85 million with unrealized gains (losses) of $23 million and $11 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Methodology for Amortization of Premium and Accretion of Discount on Structured Securities

Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on structured securities considers the estimated timing and amount of prepayments of the underlying loans. Actual prepayment experience is periodically reviewed and effective yields are recalculated when differences arise between the originally anticipated and the actual prepayments received and currently anticipated. Prepayment assumptions for single class and multi-class mortgage-backed and ABS are estimated using inputs obtained from third-party specialists and based on management’s knowledge of the current market. For credit-sensitive mortgage-backed and ABS and certain prepayment-sensitive securities, the effective yield is recalculated on a prospective basis. For all other mortgage-backed and ABS, the effective yield is recalculated on a retrospective basis.

Maturities of Fixed Maturity Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity date, were as follows at:



	December 31,
	2013				2012
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Due in one year or less	$	15,828	$	16,030	$	24,177	$	24,394
Due after one year through five years	70,467		74,229		66,973		70,759
Due after five years through ten years	78,159		83,223		82,376		91,975
Due after ten years	103,405		109,529		97,739		114,533
Subtotal	267,859		283,011		271,265		301,661
Structured securities (RMBS, CMBS and ABS)	65,740		67,176		69,605		72,605
Total fixed maturity securities	$	333,599	$	350,187	$	340,870	$	374,266

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to the exercise of call or prepayment options. Fixed maturity securities not due at a single maturity date have been presented in the year of final contractual maturity. RMBS, CMBS and ABS are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity.

Continuous Gross Unrealized Losses for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS by Sector

The following table presents the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity and equity securities AFS in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by sector and by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.



	December 31, 2013								December 31, 2012
	Less than 12 Months				Equal to or Greater than 12 Months				Less than 12 Months				Equal to or Greater than 12 Months
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In millions, except number of securities)
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. corporate	$	13,889	$	808	$	3,807	$	421	$	3,799	$	88	$	3,695	$	342
Foreign corporate	9,019		402		2,320		163		2,783		96		2,873		180
Foreign government	5,052		336		1,846		51		1,431		22		543		49
U.S. Treasury and agency	15,225		1,037		357		19		1,951		11		—		—
RMBS	10,754		363		2,302		333		735		31		4,098		633
CMBS	3,696		142		631		28		842		11		577		46
ABS	3,772		59		978		124		1,920		30		1,410		139
State and political subdivision	3,109		225		351		81		260		4		251		66
Total fixed maturity securities	$	64,516	$	3,372	$	12,592	$	1,220	$	13,721	$	293	$	13,447	$	1,455
Equity securities
Common stock	$	81	$	4	$	16	$	1	$	201	$	18	$	14	$	1
Non-redeemable preferred stock	364		65		191		47		—		—		295		140
Total equity securities	$	445	$	69	$	207	$	48	$	201	$	18	$	309	$	141
Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position	4,480				1,571				1,941				1,335

Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities

Evaluation and Measurement Methodologies

Management considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in management’s evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Considerations used in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the estimated fair value has been below cost or amortized cost; (ii) the potential for impairments when the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties; (iii) the potential for impairments in an entire industry sector or sub-sector; (iv) the potential for impairments in certain economically depressed geographic locations; (v) the potential for impairments where the issuer, series of issuers or industry has suffered a catastrophic loss or has exhausted natural resources; (vi) with respect to fixed maturity securities, whether the Company has the intent to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell a particular security before the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost recovers; (vii) with respect to structured securities, changes in forecasted cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security; and (viii) other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from regulators and rating agencies.

The methodology and significant inputs used to determine the amount of credit loss on fixed maturity securities are as follows:


•	The Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the present value of future cash flows. The discount rate is generally the effective interest rate of the security prior to impairment.

•

When determining collectability and the period over which value is expected to recover, the Company applies considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process which incorporates information regarding the specific security, fundamentals of the industry and geographic area in which the security issuer operates, and overall macroeconomic conditions. Projected future cash flows are estimated using assumptions derived from management’s best estimates of likely scenario-based outcomes after giving consideration to a variety of variables that include, but are not limited to: payment terms of the security; the likelihood that the issuer can service the interest and principal payments; the quality and amount of any credit enhancements; the security’s position within the capital structure of the issuer; possible corporate restructurings or asset sales by the issuer; and changes to the rating of the security or the issuer by rating agencies.

•

Additional considerations are made when assessing the unique features that apply to certain structured securities including, but not limited to: the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying loans or assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security.

•

When determining the amount of the credit loss for U.S. and foreign corporate securities, foreign government securities and state and political subdivision securities, the estimated fair value is considered the recovery value when available information does not indicate that another value is more appropriate. When information is identified that indicates a recovery value other than estimated fair value, management considers in the determination of recovery value the same considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process as described above, as well as any private and public sector programs to restructure such securities.

With respect to securities that have attributes of debt and equity (perpetual hybrid securities), consideration is given in the OTTI analysis as to whether there has been any deterioration in the credit of the issuer and the likelihood of recovery in value of the securities that are in a severe and extended unrealized loss position. Consideration is also given as to whether any perpetual hybrid securities, with an unrealized loss, regardless of credit rating, have deferred any dividend payments. When an OTTI loss has occurred, the OTTI loss is the entire difference between the perpetual hybrid security’s cost and its estimated fair value with a corresponding charge to earnings.

The cost or amortized cost of fixed maturity and equity securities is adjusted for OTTI in the period in which the determination is made. The Company does not change the revised cost basis for subsequent recoveries in value.

In periods subsequent to the recognition of OTTI on a fixed maturity security, the Company accounts for the impaired security as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. Accordingly, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis is accreted over the remaining term of the fixed maturity security in a prospective manner based on the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows.

Current Period Evaluation

Based on the Company’s current evaluation of its AFS securities in an unrealized loss position in accordance with its impairment policy, and the Company’s current intentions and assessments (as applicable to the type of security) about holding, selling and any requirements to sell these securities, the Company has concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013. Future OTTI will depend primarily on economic fundamentals, issuer performance (including changes in the present value of future cash flows expected to be collected), and changes in credit ratings, collateral valuation, interest rates and credit spreads. If economic fundamentals deteriorate or if there are adverse changes in the above factors, OTTI may be incurred in upcoming periods.

Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities increased $2.9 billion during the year ended December 31, 2013 from $1.7 billion to $4.6 billion. The increase in gross unrealized losses for the year ended December 31, 2013, was primarily attributable to an increase in interest rates, partially offset by narrowing credit spreads.

At December 31, 2013, $296 million of the total $4.6 billion of gross unrealized losses were from 95 fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss position of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater.

Investment Grade Fixed Maturity Securities

Of the $296 million of gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater, $165 million, or 56%, are related to gross unrealized losses on 64 investment grade fixed maturity securities. Unrealized losses on investment grade fixed maturity securities are principally related to widening credit spreads and, with respect to fixed-rate fixed maturity securities, rising interest rates since purchase.

Below Investment Grade Fixed Maturity Securities

Of the $296 million of gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater, $131 million, or 44%, are related to gross unrealized losses on 31 below investment grade fixed maturity securities. Unrealized losses on below investment grade fixed maturity securities are principally related to non-agency RMBS (primarily alternative residential mortgage loans) and ABS (primarily foreign ABS) and are the result of significantly wider credit spreads resulting from higher risk premiums since purchase, largely due to economic and market uncertainties including concerns over unemployment levels and valuations of residential real estate supporting non-agency RMBS. Management evaluates non-agency RMBS and ABS based on actual and projected cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security.

Equity Securities

Gross unrealized losses on equity securities decreased $42 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 from $159 million to $117 million. Of the $117 million, $39 million were from 11 equity securities with gross unrealized losses of 20% or more of cost for 12 months or greater, all of which were financial services industry investment grade non-redeemable preferred stock, of which 65% were rated A or better.

Mortgage Loans

Mortgage Loans by Portfolio Segment

Mortgage loans are summarized as follows at:



	December 31,
	2013					2012
	Carrying Value			% of Total		Carrying Value			% of Total
	(In millions)					(In millions)
Mortgage loans held-for-investment:
Commercial	$	40,926		70.9	%	$	40,472		71.0	%
Agricultural	12,391			21.5		12,843			22.5
Residential	2,772			4.8		958			1.7
Subtotal (1)	56,089			97.2		54,273			95.2
Valuation allowances	(322		)	(0.6	)	(347		)	(0.6	)
Subtotal mortgage loans held-for-investment, net	55,767			96.6		53,926			94.6
Residential — FVO	338			0.6		—			—
Commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs — FVO	1,598			2.8		2,666			4.7
Total mortgage loans held-for-investment, net	57,703			100.0		56,592			99.3
Mortgage loans held-for-sale	3			—		414			0.7
Total mortgage loans, net	$	57,706		100.0	%	$	57,006		100.0	%

______________


(1)	Purchases of mortgage loans were $2.2 billion and $205 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

See “— Variable Interest Entities” for discussion of CSEs.

Mortgage Loans and Valuation Allowance by Portfolio Segment

The carrying value prior to valuation allowance (“recorded investment”) in mortgage loans held-for-investment, by portfolio segment, by method of evaluation of credit loss, and the related valuation allowances, by type of credit loss, were as follows at:



	December 31,
	2013								2012
	Commercial		Agricultural		Residential		Total		Commercial		Agricultural		Residential		Total
	(In millions)
Mortgage loans:
Evaluated individually for credit losses	$	506	$	100	$	16	$	622	$	539	$	181	$	13	$	733
Evaluated collectively for credit losses	40,420		12,291		2,756		55,467		39,933		12,662		945		53,540
Total mortgage loans	40,926		12,391		2,772		56,089		40,472		12,843		958		54,273
Valuation allowances:
Specific credit losses	58		7		1		66		94		21		2		117
Non-specifically identified credit losses	200		37		19		256		199		31		—		230
Total valuation allowances	258		44		20		322		293		52		2		347
Mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance	$	40,668	$	12,347	$	2,752	$	55,767	$	40,179	$	12,791	$	956	$	53,926

Valuation Allowance Rollforward by Portfolio Segment

The changes in the valuation allowance, by portfolio segment, were as follows:



	Commercial			Agricultural			Residential			Total
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	562		$	88		$	14		$	664
Provision (release)	(152		)	(3		)	10			(145		)
Charge-offs, net of recoveries	(12		)	(4		)	(3		)	(19		)
Transfers to held-for-sale (1)	—			—			(19		)	(19		)
Balance at December 31, 2011	398			81			2			481
Provision (release)	(92		)	—			6			(86		)
Charge-offs, net of recoveries	(13		)	(24		)	—			(37		)
Transfers to held-for-sale (1)	—			(5		)	(6		)	(11		)
Balance at December 31, 2012	293			52			2			347
Provision (release)	(35		)	4			18			(13		)
Charge-offs, net of recoveries	—			(12		)	—			(12		)
Transfers to held-for-sale	—			—			—			—
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	258		$	44		$	20		$	322

______________


(1)	The valuation allowance on and the related carrying value of certain residential mortgage loans held-for-investment were transferred to mortgage loans held-for-sale in connection with the MetLife Bank Divestiture. See Note 3.

Valuation Allowance Methodology

Mortgage loans are considered to be impaired when it is probable that, based upon current information and events, the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the loan agreement. Specific valuation allowances are established using the same methodology for all three portfolio segments as the excess carrying value of a loan over either (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, (ii) the estimated fair value of the loan’s underlying collateral if the loan is in the process of foreclosure or otherwise collateral dependent, or (iii) the loan’s observable market price. A common evaluation framework is used for establishing non-specific valuation allowances for all loan portfolio segments; however, a separate non-specific valuation allowance is calculated and maintained for each loan portfolio segment that is based on inputs unique to each loan portfolio segment. Non-specific valuation allowances are established for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics where a property-specific or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which the Company expects to incur a credit loss. These evaluations are based upon several loan portfolio segment-specific factors, including the Company’s experience for loan losses, defaults and loss severity, and loss expectations for loans with similar risk characteristics. These evaluations are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.

Commercial and Agricultural Mortgage Loan Portfolio Segments

The Company typically uses several years of historical experience in establishing non-specific valuation allowances which captures multiple economic cycles. For evaluations of commercial mortgage loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include the impact of a rapid change to the economy, which may not be reflected in the loan portfolio, and recent loss and recovery trend experience as compared to historical loss and recovery experience. For evaluations of agricultural mortgage loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include increased stress in certain sectors, which may be evidenced by higher delinquency rates, or a change in the number of higher risk loans. On a quarterly basis, management incorporates the impact of these current market events and conditions on historical experience in determining the non-specific valuation allowance established for commercial and agricultural mortgage loans.

All commercial mortgage loans are reviewed on an ongoing basis which may include an analysis of the property financial statements and rent roll, lease rollover analysis, property inspections, market analysis, estimated valuations of the underlying collateral, loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, and tenant creditworthiness. All agricultural mortgage loans are monitored on an ongoing basis. The monitoring process focuses on higher risk loans, which include those that are classified as restructured, delinquent or in foreclosure, as well as loans with higher loan-to-value ratios and lower debt service coverage ratios. The monitoring process for agricultural mortgage loans is generally similar to the commercial mortgage loan monitoring process, with a focus on higher risk loans, including reviews on a geographic and property-type basis. Higher risk loans are reviewed individually on an ongoing basis for potential credit loss and specific valuation allowances are established using the methodology described above. Quarterly, the remaining loans are reviewed on a pool basis by aggregating groups of loans that have similar risk characteristics for potential credit loss, and non-specific valuation allowances are established as described above using inputs that are unique to each segment of the loan portfolio.

For commercial mortgage loans, the primary credit quality indicator is the debt service coverage ratio, which compares a property’s net operating income to amounts needed to service the principal and interest due under the loan. Generally, the lower the debt service coverage ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The Company also reviews the loan-to-value ratio of its commercial mortgage loan portfolio. Loan-to-value ratios compare the unpaid principal balance of the loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. Generally, the higher the loan-to-value ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio, as well as the values utilized in calculating these ratios, are updated annually, on a rolling basis, with a portion of the loan portfolio updated each quarter.

For agricultural mortgage loans, the Company’s primary credit quality indicator is the loan-to-value ratio. The values utilized in calculating this ratio are developed in connection with the ongoing review of the agricultural mortgage loan portfolio and are routinely updated.

Residential Mortgage Loan Portfolio Segment

The Company’s residential mortgage loan portfolio is comprised primarily of closed end, amortizing residential mortgage loans. For evaluations of residential mortgage loans, the key inputs of expected frequency and expected loss reflect current market conditions, with expected frequency adjusted, when appropriate, for differences from market conditions and the Company’s historical experience. In contrast to the commercial and agricultural mortgage loan portfolios, residential mortgage loans are smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. Non-specific valuation allowances are established using the evaluation framework described above for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics from inputs that are unique to the residential segment of the loan portfolio. Loan specific valuation allowances are only established on residential mortgage loans when they have been restructured and are established using the methodology described above for all loan portfolio segments.

For residential mortgage loans, the Company’s primary credit quality indicator is whether the loan is performing or nonperforming. The Company generally defines nonperforming residential mortgage loans as those that are 60 or more days past due and/or in non-accrual status which is assessed monthly. Generally, nonperforming residential mortgage loans have a higher risk of experiencing a credit loss.

Credit Quality of Commercial Mortgage Loans

The credit quality of commercial mortgage loans held-for-investment, were as follows at:



	Recorded Investment										Estimated Fair Value		% of Total
	Debt Service Coverage Ratios						Total		% of Total
	> 1.20x		1.00x - 1.20x		< 1.00x		Total		% of Total
	(In millions)										(In millions)
December 31, 2013:
Loan-to-value ratios:
Less than 65%	$	30,552	$	614	$	841	$	32,007	78.2	%	$	33,519	78.9	%
65% to 75%	6,360		438		149		6,947		17.0		7,039		16.6
76% to 80%	525		192		189		906		2.2		892		2.1
Greater than 80%	661		242		163		1,066		2.6		1,006		2.4
Total	$	38,098	$	1,486	$	1,342	$	40,926	100.0	%	$	42,456	100.0	%
December 31, 2012:
Loan-to-value ratios:
Less than 65%	$	29,839	$	730	$	722	$	31,291	77.3	%	$	33,730	78.3	%
65% to 75%	5,057		672		153		5,882		14.6		6,129		14.2
76% to 80%	938		131		316		1,385		3.4		1,436		3.3
Greater than 80%	1,085		552		277		1,914		4.7		1,787		4.2
Total	$	36,919	$	2,085	$	1,468	$	40,472	100.0	%	$	43,082	100.0	%

Credit Quality of Agricultural Mortgage Loans

The credit quality of agricultural mortgage loans held-for-investment, were as follows at:



	December 31,
	2013				2012
	Recorded Investment		% of Total		Recorded Investment		% of Total
	(In millions)				(In millions)
Loan-to-value ratios:
Less than 65%	$	11,461	92.5	%	$	11,908	92.7	%
65% to 75%	729		5.9		590		4.6
76% to 80%	84		0.7		92		0.7
Greater than 80%	117		0.9		253		2.0
Total	$	12,391	100.0	%	$	12,843	100.0	%

The estimated fair value of agricultural mortgage loans held-for-investment was $12.7 billion and $13.3 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Credit Quality of Residential Mortgage Loans

The credit quality of residential mortgage loans held-for-investment, were as follows at:



	December 31,
	2013				2012
	Recorded Investment		% of Total		Recorded Investment		% of Total
	(In millions)				(In millions)
Performance indicators:
Performing	$	2,693	97.1	%	$	929	97.0	%
Nonperforming	79		2.9		29		3.0
Total	$	2,772	100.0	%	$	958	100.0	%

The estimated fair value of residential mortgage loans held-for-investment was $2.8 billion and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Past Due and Interest Accrual Status of Mortgage Loans

The Company has a high quality, well performing mortgage loan portfolio, with 99% of all mortgage loans classified as performing at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company defines delinquency consistent with industry practice, when mortgage loans are past due as follows: commercial and residential mortgage loans — 60 days and agricultural mortgage loans — 90 days. The past due and accrual status of mortgage loans at recorded investment, prior to valuation allowances, by portfolio segment, were as follows at:



	Past Due				Greater than 90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing Interest				Nonaccrual Status
	December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012		December 31, 2013		December 31, 2012
	(In millions)
Commercial	$	12	$	2	$	12	$	—	$	191	$	84
Agricultural	44		116		—		53		47		67
Residential	79		29		—		—		65		18
Total	$	135	$	147	$	12	$	53	$	303	$	169

Impaired Mortgage Loans

Impaired mortgage loans held-for-investment, including those modified in a troubled debt restructuring, by portfolio segment, were as follows at and for the years ended:



	Loans with a Valuation Allowance								Loans without a Valuation Allowance				All Impaired Loans
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Valuation Allowances		Carrying Value		Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Carrying Value		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income
	(In millions)
December 31, 2013:
Commercial	$	214	$	210	$	58	$	152	$	299	$	296	$	513	$	448	$	526	$	15
Agricultural	68		66		7		59		35		34		103		93		153		9
Residential	12		12		1		11		5		4		17		15		14		—
Total	$	294	$	288	$	66	$	222	$	339	$	334	$	633	$	556	$	693	$	24

December 31, 2012:
Commercial	$	445	$	436	$	94	$	342	$	103	$	103	$	548	$	445	$	464	$	14
Agricultural	110		107		21		86		79		74		189		160		204		8
Residential	13		13		2		11		—		—		13		11		13		—
Total	$	568	$	556	$	117	$	439	$	182	$	177	$	750	$	616	$	681	$	22

Unpaid principal balance is generally prior to any charge-offs. Interest income recognized is primarily cash basis income. The average recorded investment for commercial, agricultural and residential mortgage loans was $313 million, $252 million and $23 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011; and interest income recognized for commercial, agricultural and residential mortgage loans was $6 million, $5 million and $0, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Mortgage Loans Modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring

For a small portion of the mortgage loan portfolio, classified as troubled debt restructurings, concessions are granted related to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Generally, the types of concessions include: reduction of the contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than current market interest rates, and/or a reduction of accrued interest. The amount, timing and extent of the concession granted is considered in determining any impairment or changes in the specific valuation allowance recorded with the restructuring. Through the continuous monitoring process, a specific valuation allowance may have been recorded prior to the quarter when the mortgage loan is modified in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the carrying value (after specific valuation allowance) before and after modification through a troubled debt restructuring may not change significantly, or may increase if the expected recovery is higher than the pre-modification recovery assessment. The number of mortgage loans and carrying value after specific valuation allowance of mortgage loans modified during the period in a troubled debt restructuring were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013					2012
	Number of Mortgage Loans	Carrying Value after Specific Valuation Allowance				Number of Mortgage Loans	Carrying Value after Specific Valuation Allowance
		Pre-Modification		Post-Modification			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
		(In millions)					(In millions)
Commercial	1	$	49	$	49	1	$	222	$	199
Agricultural	3	28		28		5	17		16
Residential	27	5		5		—	—		—
Total	31	$	82	$	82	6	$	239	$	215

The Company had one residential mortgage loan modified in a troubled debt restructuring with a subsequent payment default with a carrying value of less than $1 million at December 31, 2013. There were no mortgage loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring with a subsequent payment default at December 31, 2012. Payment default is determined in the same manner as delinquency status as described above.

Other Invested Assets

Other invested assets is comprised primarily of freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values (see Note 9), tax credit and renewable energy partnerships, and leveraged leases.

Leveraged Leases

Investment in leveraged leases consisted of the following at:



	December 31,
	2013			2012
	(In millions)
Rental receivables, net	$	1,491		$	1,564
Estimated residual values	1,325			1,474
Subtotal	2,816			3,038
Unearned income	(870		)	(1,040		)
Investment in leveraged leases, net of non-recourse debt	$	1,946		$	1,998

Rental receivables are generally due in periodic installments. The payment periods range from one to 15 years but in certain circumstances can be over 30 years. For rental receivables, the primary credit quality indicator is whether the rental receivable is performing or nonperforming, which is assessed monthly. The Company generally defines nonperforming rental receivables as those that are 90 days or more past due. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, all rental receivables were performing.

The deferred income tax liability related to leveraged leases was $1.6 billion at both December 31, 2013 and 2012.

The components of income from investment in leveraged leases, excluding net investment gains (losses), were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
	(In millions)
Income from investment in leveraged leases	$	82	$	57	$	125
Less: Income tax expense on leveraged leases	29		20		44
Investment income after income tax from investment in leveraged leases	$	53	$	37	$	81

Cash Equivalents

The carrying value of cash equivalents, which includes securities and other investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase, was $3.8 billion and $6.1 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)

The components of net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in AOCI, were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities	$	16,672		$	33,641		$	21,096
Fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses in AOCI	(218		)	(361		)	(724		)
Total fixed maturity securities	16,454			33,280			20,372
Equity securities	390			97			(167		)
Derivatives	375			1,274			1,514
Other	(73		)	(30		)	72
Subtotal	17,146			34,621			21,791
Amounts allocated from:
Insurance liability loss recognition	(898		)	(6,049		)	(3,996		)
DAC and VOBA related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI	6			19			47
DAC and VOBA	(1,190		)	(2,485		)	(1,800		)
Policyholder dividend obligation	(1,771		)	(3,828		)	(2,919		)
Subtotal	(3,853		)	(12,343		)	(8,668		)
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI	73			119			236
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)	(4,956		)	(7,973		)	(4,694		)
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)	8,410			14,424			8,665
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests	4			(5		)	9
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to MetLife, Inc.	$	8,414		$	14,419		$	8,674

The changes in fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses included in AOCI were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1,	$	(361	)	$	(724	)
Noncredit OTTI losses and subsequent changes recognized (1)	60			(29		)
Securities sold with previous noncredit OTTI loss	149			177
Subsequent changes in estimated fair value	(66		)	215
Balance at December 31,	$	(218	)	$	(361	)

______________


(1)	Noncredit OTTI losses and subsequent changes recognized, net of DAC, were $52 million and ($21) million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1,	$	14,419		$	8,674		$	3,122
Fixed maturity securities on which noncredit OTTI losses have been recognized	143			363			(123		)
Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the year	(17,618		)	12,467			14,823
Unrealized investment gains (losses) of subsidiary at the date of disposal	—			—			(105		)
Unrealized investment gains (losses) relating to:
Insurance liability gain (loss) recognition	5,151			(2,053		)	(3,406		)
Insurance liability gain (loss) recognition of subsidiary at the date of disposal	—			—			82
DAC and VOBA related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI	(13		)	(28		)	9
DAC and VOBA	1,295			(685		)	(808		)
DAC and VOBA of subsidiary at date of disposal	—			—			11
Policyholder dividend obligation	2,057			(909		)	(2,043		)
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI	(46		)	(117		)	39
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)	3,017			(3,279		)	(2,936		)
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) of subsidiary at date of disposal	—			—			4
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)	8,405			14,433			8,669
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests	9			(14		)	5
Balance at December 31,	$	8,414		$	14,419		$	8,674
Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)	$	(6,014	)	$	5,759		$	5,547
Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests	9			(14		)	5
Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) attributable to MetLife, Inc.	$	(6,005	)	$	5,745		$	5,552

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Investments in any counterparty that were greater than 10% of the Company’s equity, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, were in fixed income securities of the Japanese government and its agencies with an estimated fair value of $21.7 billion and $22.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company’s investment in fixed maturity and equity securities to counterparties that primarily conduct business in Japan, including Japan government and agency fixed maturity securities, was $26.9 billion and $28.7 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Securities Lending

Elements of the securities lending program are presented below at:



	December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In millions)
Securities on loan: (1)
Amortized cost	$	27,094	$	23,380
Estimated fair value	$	27,595	$	27,077
Cash collateral on deposit from counterparties (2)	$	28,319	$	27,727
Security collateral on deposit from counterparties (3)	$	—	$	104
Reinvestment portfolio — estimated fair value	$	28,481	$	28,112

______________


(1)	Included within fixed maturity securities, short-term investments, equity securities and cash and cash equivalents.


(2)	Included within payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions.


(3)	Security collateral on deposit from counterparties may not be sold or repledged, unless the counterparty is in default, and is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

Invested Assets on Deposit, Held in Trust and Pledged as Collateral

Invested assets on deposit, held in trust and pledged as collateral are presented below at estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, fixed maturity and equity securities, and FVO and trading securities, and at carrying value for mortgage loans at:



	December 31,
	2013		2012
	(In millions)
Invested assets on deposit (regulatory deposits)	$	2,153	$	2,362
Invested assets held in trust (collateral financing arrangements and reinsurance agreements)	11,004		12,434
Invested assets pledged as collateral (1)	23,770		23,251
Total invested assets on deposit, held in trust and pledged as collateral	$	36,927	$	38,047

______________


(1)	The Company has pledged invested assets in connection with various agreements and transactions, including funding agreements (see Notes 4 and 12), collateral financing arrangements (see Note 13) and derivative transactions (see Note 9).

In the second quarter of 2013, MetLife, Inc. announced its plans to merge three U.S. based life insurance companies and an offshore reinsurance subsidiary to create one larger U.S. based and U.S. regulated life insurance company (the “Mergers”). The companies to be merged are MICC, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company (“MLI-USA”) and MetLife Investors Insurance Company (“MLIIC”), each a U.S. insurance company that issues variable annuity products in addition to other products, and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. (“Exeter”), a reinsurance company that mainly reinsures guarantees associated with variable annuity products. MICC, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware, will be the surviving entity. In October 2013, Exeter, formerly a Cayman Islands company, was re-domesticated to Delaware. Effective January 1, 2014, following receipt of New York State Department of Financial Services (the “Department of Financial Services”) approval, MICC withdrew its license to issue insurance policies and annuity contracts in New York. Also effective January 1, 2014, MICC reinsured with an affiliate all existing New York insurance policies and annuity contracts that include a separate account feature; on December 31, 2013, MICC deposited investments with an estimated fair market value of $6.3 billion into a custodial account, which became restricted on January 1, 2014, to secure MICC’s remaining New York policyholder liabilities not covered by the reinsurance. The Mergers are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. See Note 12 for information regarding the impact of the re-domestication of Exeter on availability under our credit facilities.

See “— Securities Lending” for securities on loan and Note 7 for investments designated to the closed block.

Purchased Credit Impaired Investments

Investments acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at the acquisition date that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments are classified as purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) investments. For each investment, the excess of the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date over its acquisition date fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized as net investment income on an effective yield basis. If subsequently, based on current information and events, it is probable that there is a significant increase in cash flows previously expected to be collected or if actual cash flows are significantly greater than cash flows previously expected to be collected, the accretable yield is adjusted prospectively. The excess of the contractually required payments (including interest) as of the acquisition date over the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date is referred to as the nonaccretable difference, and this amount is not expected to be realized as net investment income. Decreases in cash flows expected to be collected can result in OTTI or the recognition of mortgage loan valuation allowances.

The Company’s PCI investments, by invested asset class, were as follows at:



	December 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	Fixed Maturity Securities				Mortgage Loans
	(In millions)
Outstanding principal and interest balance (1)	$	5,319	$	4,905	$	291	$	440
Carrying value (2)	$	4,109	$	3,900	$	138	$	199

______________


(1)	Represents the contractually required payments, which is the sum of contractual principal, whether or not currently due, and accrued interest.


(2)	Estimated fair value plus accrued interest for fixed maturity securities and amortized cost, plus accrued interest, less any valuation allowances, for mortgage loans.

The following table presents information about PCI investments acquired during the periods indicated:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
	Fixed Maturity Securities				Mortgage Loans
	(In millions)
Contractually required payments (including interest)	$	1,872	$	2,083	$	—	$	—
Cash flows expected to be collected (1)	$	1,446	$	1,524	$	—	$	—
Fair value of investments acquired	$	978	$	991	$	—	$	—

______________


(1)	Represents undiscounted principal and interest cash flow expectations, at the date of acquisition.

The following table presents activity for the accretable yield on PCI investments:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
	Fixed Maturity Securities						Mortgage Loans
	(In millions)
Accretable yield, January 1,	$	2,665		$	2,311		$	184		$	254
Investments purchased	468			533			—			—
Accretion recognized in earnings	(260		)	(203		)	(87		)	(71		)
Disposals	(152		)	(102		)	—			—
Reclassification (to) from nonaccretable difference	25			126			(23		)	1
Accretable yield, December 31,	$	2,746		$	2,665		$	74		$	184

Collectively Significant Equity Method Investments

The Company holds investments in real estate joint ventures, real estate funds and other limited partnership interests consisting of leveraged buy-out funds, hedge funds, private equity funds, joint ventures and other funds. The portion of these investments accounted for under the equity method had a carrying value of $12.1 billion at December 31, 2013. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss related to these equity method investments is limited to the carrying value of these investments plus unfunded commitments of $4.0 billion at December 31, 2013. Except for certain real estate joint ventures, the Company’s investments in real estate funds and other limited partnership interests are generally of a passive nature in that the Company does not participate in the management of the entities.

As described in Note 1, the Company generally records its share of earnings in its equity method investments using a three-month lag methodology and within net investment income. Aggregate net investment income from these equity method investments exceeded 10% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations for two of the three most recent annual periods: 2013 and 2012. The Company is providing the following aggregated summarized financial data for such equity method investments, for the most recent annual periods, in order to provide comparative information. This aggregated summarized financial data does not represent the Company’s proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, or earnings of such entities.

The aggregated summarized financial data presented below reflects the latest available financial information and is as of, and for, the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Aggregate total assets of these entities totaled $303.4 billion and $285.2 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Aggregate total liabilities of these entities totaled $29.7 billion and $28.8 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) of these entities totaled $26.3 billion, $17.9 billion and $9.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) from the underlying entities in which the Company invests is primarily comprised of investment income, including recurring investment income and realized and unrealized investment gains (losses).

Variable Interest Entities

The Company has invested in certain structured transactions (including CSEs), formed trusts to invest proceeds from certain collateral financing arrangements and has insurance operations that are VIEs. In certain instances, the Company holds both the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity, as well as an economic interest in the entity and, as such, is deemed to be the primary beneficiary or consolidator of the entity.

The determination of the VIE’s primary beneficiary requires an evaluation of the contractual and implied rights and obligations associated with each party’s relationship with or involvement in the entity, an estimate of the entity’s expected losses and expected residual returns and the allocation of such estimates to each party involved in the entity. The Company generally uses a qualitative approach to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary. However, for VIEs that are investment companies or apply measurement principles consistent with those utilized by investment companies, the primary beneficiary is based on a risks and rewards model and is defined as the entity that will absorb a majority of a VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of a VIE’s expected residual returns if no single entity absorbs a majority of expected losses, or both. The Company reassesses its involvement with VIEs on a quarterly basis. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs in the determination of the primary beneficiary could have a material effect on the amounts presented within the consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated VIEs

The following table presents the total assets and total liabilities relating to VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and which are consolidated at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Creditors or beneficial interest holders of VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary have no recourse to the general credit of the Company, as the Company’s obligation to the VIEs is limited to the amount of its committed investment.



	December 31,
	2013				2012
	Total Assets		Total Liabilities		Total Assets		Total Liabilities
	(In millions)
MRSC (collateral financing arrangement (primarily securities)) (1)	$	3,440	$	—	$	3,439	$	—
Operating joint venture (2)	2,095		1,777		—		—
CSEs (assets (primarily loans) and liabilities (primarily debt)) (3)	1,630		1,457		2,730		2,545
Investments:
Real estate joint ventures (4)	1,181		443		11		14
Other invested assets	82		7		85		—
FVO and trading securities	69		—		71		—
Other limited partnership interests	61		—		356		8
Total	$	8,558	$	3,684	$	6,692	$	2,567

______________


(1)	See Note 13 for a description of the MetLife Reinsurance Company of South Carolina (“MRSC”) collateral financing arrangement.

(2)

Assets of the operating joint venture are primarily fixed maturity securities and separate account assets. Liabilities of the operating joint venture are primarily future policy benefits, other policyholder funds and separate account liabilities. The assets and liabilities of the operating joint venture were consolidated in earlier periods; however, as a result of the quarterly reassessment in the first quarter of 2013, it was determined to be a consolidated VIE.

(3)

The Company consolidates entities that are structured as CMBS and as collateralized debt obligations. The assets of these entities can only be used to settle their respective liabilities, and under no circumstances is the Company liable for any principal or interest shortfalls should any arise. The Company’s exposure was limited to that of its remaining investment in these entities of $154 million and $168 million at estimated fair value at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The long-term debt bears interest primarily at fixed rates ranging from 2.25% to 5.57%, payable primarily on a monthly basis. Interest expense related to these obligations, included in other expenses, was $122 million, $163 million and $324 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively.

(4)

The Company consolidated an open ended core real estate fund formed in the fourth quarter of 2013, which represented the majority of the balances at December 31, 2013. Assets of the real estate fund are a real estate investment trust which holds primarily traditional core income-producing real estate which has associated liabilities that are primarily non-recourse debt secured by certain real estate assets of the fund. The assets of these entities can only be used to settle their respective liabilities, and under no circumstances is the Company liable for any principal or interest shortfalls should any arise. The Company’s exposure was limited to that of its investment in the real estate fund of $178 million at carrying value at December 31, 2013. The long-term debt bears interest primarily at fixed rates ranging from 1.39% to 4.45%, payable primarily on a monthly basis. Interest expense related to these obligations, included in other expenses, was less than $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Unconsolidated VIEs

The carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss relating to VIEs in which the Company holds a significant variable interest but is not the primary beneficiary and which have not been consolidated were as follows at:



	December 31,
	2013				2012
	Carrying Amount		Maximum Exposure to Loss (1)		Carrying Amount		Maximum Exposure to Loss (1)
	(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities AFS:
Structured securities (RMBS, CMBS and ABS) (2)	$	67,176	$	67,176	$	72,605	$	72,605
U.S. and foreign corporate	3,966		3,966		5,287		5,287
Other limited partnership interests	5,041		6,994		4,436		5,908
Other invested assets	1,509		1,897		1,117		1,431
FVO and trading securities	619		619		563		563
Mortgage loans	106		106		351		351
Real estate joint ventures	70		71		150		157
Equity securities AFS:
Non-redeemable preferred stock	35		35		32		32
Total	$	78,522	$	80,864	$	84,541	$	86,334

______________

(1)

The maximum exposure to loss relating to fixed maturity securities AFS, FVO and trading securities and equity securities AFS is equal to their carrying amounts or the carrying amounts of retained interests. The maximum exposure to loss relating to other limited partnership interests, mortgage loans and real estate joint ventures is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded commitments of the Company. For certain of its investments in other invested assets, the Company’s return is in the form of income tax credits which are guaranteed by creditworthy third parties. For such investments, the maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded commitments, reduced by income tax credits guaranteed by third parties of $257 million and $318 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Such a maximum loss would be expected to occur only upon bankruptcy of the issuer or investee.


(2)	For these variable interests, the Company’s involvement is limited to that of a passive investor.

As described in Note 21, the Company makes commitments to fund partnership investments in the normal course of business. Excluding these commitments, the Company did not provide financial or other support to investees designated as VIEs during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Net Investment Income

The components of net investment income were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
	(In millions)
Investment income:
Fixed maturity securities	$	15,071	$	15,218	$	15,037
Equity securities	127		133		141
FVO and trading securities — Actively Traded Securities and FVO general account securities (1)	65		88		31
Mortgage loans	3,020		3,191		3,164
Policy loans	620		626		641
Real estate and real estate joint ventures	909		834		688
Other limited partnership interests	955		845		681
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	181		163		167
International joint ventures	10		19		(12		)
Other	165		131		178
Subtotal	21,123		21,248		20,716
Less: Investment expenses	1,198		1,090		1,019
Subtotal, net	19,925		20,158		19,697
FVO and trading securities — FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments (1)	2,172		1,473		(453		)
Securitized reverse residential mortgage loans	—		177		—
FVO CSEs - interest income:
Commercial mortgage loans	132		172		332
Securities	3		4		9
Subtotal	2,307		1,826		(112		)
Net investment income	$	22,232	$	21,984	$	19,585

______________


(1)	Changes in estimated fair value subsequent to purchase for securities still held as of the end of the respective years included in net investment income were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013		2012		2011
	(In millions)
Actively Traded Securities and FVO general account securities	$	18	$	51	$	(3	)
FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments	$	1,579	$	1,170	$	(647	)

See “— Variable Interest Entities” for discussion of CSEs.

Net Investment Gains (Losses)

Components of Net Investment Gains (Losses)

The components of net investment gains (losses) were as follows:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(In millions)
Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities:
Total OTTI losses recognized — by sector and industry:
U.S. and foreign corporate securities — by industry:
Utility	$	(48	)	$	(61	)	$	(10	)
Consumer	(11		)	(19		)	(50		)
Finance	(10		)	(32		)	(56		)
Transportation	(3		)	(17		)	—
Communications	(2		)	(19		)	(41		)
Technology	—			(6		)	(1		)
Industrial	—			(5		)	(11		)
Total U.S. and foreign corporate securities	(74		)	(159		)	(169		)
RMBS	(80		)	(97		)	(214		)
CMBS	(12		)	(51		)	(32		)
ABS	—			(9		)	(54		)
State and political subdivision	—			(1		)	—
Foreign government	—			—			(486		)
OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities recognized in earnings	(166		)	(317		)	(955		)
Fixed maturity securities — net gains (losses) on sales and disposals	561			253			25
Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities (1)	395			(64		)	(930		)
Total gains (losses) on equity securities:
Total OTTI losses recognized — by sector:
Non-redeemable preferred stock	(20		)	—			(38		)
Common stock	(6		)	(34		)	(22		)
OTTI losses on equity securities recognized in earnings	(26		)	(34		)	(60		)
Equity securities — net gains (losses) on sales and disposals	31			38			37
Total gains (losses) on equity securities	5			4			(23		)
FVO and trading securities — FVO general account securities	15			17			(2		)
Mortgage loans (1)	22			57			175
Real estate and real estate joint ventures	(19		)	(36		)	134
Other limited partnership interests	(48		)	(36		)	4
Other investment portfolio gains (losses)	22			(151		)	(7		)
Subtotal — investment portfolio gains (losses) (1)	392			(209		)	(649		)
FVO CSEs:
Commercial mortgage loans	(52		)	7			(84		)
Securities	2			—			—
Long-term debt — related to commercial mortgage loans	85			25			97
Long-term debt — related to securities	(2		)	(7		)	(8		)
Non-investment portfolio gains (losses) (2)	(264		)	(168		)	(223		)
Subtotal FVO CSEs and non-investment portfolio gains (losses)	(231		)	(143		)	(218		)
Total net investment gains (losses)	$	161		$	(352	)	$	(867	)

______________

(1)

Investment portfolio gains (losses) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 includes a net gain (loss) of $37 million and ($153) million, respectively, as a result of the MetLife Bank Divestiture, which is comprised of gains (losses) on investments sold of $78 million and $1 million, respectively, and impairments on mortgage loans of ($41) million and ($154) million, respectively. See Note 3.

(2)

Non-investment portfolio gains (losses) for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 includes a gain of $30 million and $33 million, respectively, related to certain dispositions as more fully described in Note 3. Non-investment portfolio gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2011 includes a loss of $106 million related to certain dispositions and a goodwill impairment loss of $65 million. See Notes 3 and 11.

See “— Variable Interest Entities” for discussion of CSEs.

Gains (losses) from foreign currency transactions included within net investment gains (losses) were $171 million, ($112) million and $37 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Sales or Disposals and Impairments of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities

Proceeds from sales or disposals of fixed maturity and equity securities and the components of fixed maturity and equity securities net investment gains (losses) are as shown in the table below. Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis.



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011			2013			2012			2011			2013			2012			2011
	Fixed Maturity Securities									Equity Securities									Total
	(In millions)
Proceeds	$	76,070		$	59,219		$	67,449		$	746		$	1,648		$	1,241		$	76,816		$	60,867		$	68,690
Gross investment gains	$	1,326		$	944		$	892		$	56		$	73		$	108		$	1,382		$	1,017		$	1,000
Gross investment losses	(765		)	(691		)	(867		)	(25		)	(35		)	(71		)	(790		)	(726		)	(938		)
Total OTTI losses:
Credit-related	(147		)	(223		)	(645		)	—			—			—			(147		)	(223		)	(645		)
Other (1)	(19		)	(94		)	(310		)	(26		)	(34		)	(60		)	(45		)	(128		)	(370		)
Total OTTI losses	(166		)	(317		)	(955		)	(26		)	(34		)	(60		)	(192		)	(351		)	(1,015		)
Net investment gains (losses)	$	395		$	(64	)	$	(930	)	$	5		$	4		$	(23	)	$	400		$	(60	)	$	(953	)

______________

(1)

Other OTTI losses recognized in earnings include impairments on (i) equity securities, (ii) perpetual hybrid securities classified within fixed maturity securities where the primary reason for the impairment was the severity and/or the duration of an unrealized loss position and (iii) fixed maturity securities where there is an intent to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of the decline in estimated fair value.

Credit Loss Rollforward

The table below presents a rollforward of the cumulative credit loss component of OTTI loss recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities still held for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI:



	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1,	$	392		$	471
Additions:
Initial impairments — credit loss OTTI recognized on securities not previously impaired	6			46
Additional impairments — credit loss OTTI recognized on securities previously impaired	69			70
Reductions:
Sales (maturities, pay downs or prepayments) during the period of securities previously impaired as credit loss OTTI	(87		)	(176		)
Securities impaired to net present value of expected future cash flows	—			(17		)
Increases in cash flows — accretion of previous credit loss OTTI	(2		)	(2		)
Balance at December 31,	$	378		$	392

METLIFE INC | 2013 | FY |

us-gaap:InvestmentsInDebtAndMarketableEquitySecuritiesAndCertainTradingAssetsDisclosureTextBlock