Rendering
Component: (Network and Table) |
---|
Network | 0401 - Disclosure - Organization and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) (http://advancedbioenergy.com/role/OrganizationAndSignificantAccountingPoliciesPolicies) |
Table | (Implied) |
Slicers (applies to each fact value in each table cell)
Reporting Entity [Axis] | 0001325740 (http://www.sec.gov/CIK) |
Organization and Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | Period [Axis] |
---|
2011-10-01 - 2012-09-30 |
---|
Organization and Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash |
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. The Company’s cash balances are maintained in bank depositories and periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced losses in these accounts. The Company segregates cash restricted for debt service and
has classified these funds according to the future anticipated use of the funds.
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, interest rate swaps, derivative financial instruments, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, warrants, and long-term debt. The fair value of derivative financial instruments is based on quoted market prices, which are considered to be Level 1 inputs. The fair value of warrants is determined
using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is based on Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the long-term debt is based on Level 3 inputs, estimated based on anticipated interest rates which management believes would currently be available to the
Company for similar issues of debt, taking into account the current credit risk of the Company and other market factors. The Company believes the carrying value of the debt instruments at ABE Fairmont approximate fair value. Based on the
restructuring event, the fair value of the debt instruments at ABE South Dakota is not determinable. The fair value of all other financial instruments are estimated to approximate carrying value due to the short-term nature of these instruments, and
are considered to be Level 2 inputs.
|
Fair Value Measurements |
Fair Value Measurements
In determining fair value of its derivative financial instruments and warrant liabilities, the Company uses various methods including
market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often uses certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to
the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three fair value
hierarchy categories:
Level 1: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily
available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less-active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained
from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Valuations
incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.
Commodity futures and exchange-traded commodity options contracts are reported at fair value, utilizing Level 1 inputs. For these
contracts, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes and live-trading levels from the Chicago Board of Trade
(“CBOT”) and New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) markets.
The following table summarizes financial
assets and financial liabilities measured at the approximate fair value on September 30, 2012 and 2011, utilized to measure fair value (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Liabilities—Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Other Liabilities—Warrant Derivative
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities—Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Other Liabilities—Warrant Derivative
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
182 |
|
The warrants issued contain a strike price adjustment feature, as described in Note 6. We calculated the fair
value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes valuation model. During the year ended September 30, 2012, we recognized an unrealized gain of $107,000 related to the change in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability. The warrant was
exercised in November 2012.
The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2012(1) |
|
|
September
30, 2011(1) |
|
Market value
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Exercise price
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
45.00 |
% |
|
|
46.92 |
% |
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.230 |
% |
|
|
0.250 |
% |
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Dividend rate
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
(1) |
Market value is based on trading values of comparable competitors. |
The following table
reflects the activity for liabilities measured at fair value, using Level 3 inputs for the year ended September 30, (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance of warrant derivative as of October 1,
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Initial recognition of warrant derivative on October 1, 2009
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Unrealized gain related to the change in fair value
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance as of September 30,
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
Receivables
Credit sales are made primarily to a few customers with no collateral required. Trade receivables are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of
all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by regularly evaluating individual receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic
conditions. Receivables are written off if deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received.
|
Derivative Instruments/Due From Broker |
Derivative Financial Instruments/Due From Broker
On occasion, the Company has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the Company’s exposure to price risk related to forecasted
corn purchases and forecasted ethanol sales. Accounting for derivative contracts requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. If
certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment, (b) a hedge of the exposure to
variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction, or (c) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign-currency-denominated
forecasted transaction.
Although the Company believes its derivative positions are economic hedges, none have been designated
as a hedge for accounting purposes and derivative positions are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair market value, with changes in fair value recognized in current period earnings.
In addition, certain derivative financial instruments that meet the criteria for derivative accounting treatment also qualify for a scope
exception to derivative accounting, as they are considered normal purchase and sales. The availability of this exception is based on the assumption that the Company has the ability and it is probable that it will deliver or take delivery of the
underlying item. Derivatives that are considered to be normal purchases and sales are exempt from derivative accounting treatment, and are accounted for under accrual accounting.
|
Inventories |
Inventories
Corn, chemicals, supplies, work in process, ethanol and distillers grains inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market.
|
Property and Equipment |
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
3-7 Years |
|
Process equipment
|
|
|
10 Years |
|
Building
|
|
|
40 Years |
|
Maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred; major improvements and betterments are capitalized. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount on the asset may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operations are less than the carrying value of the asset group. An impairment loss is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset
exceeds the estimated fair value on that date.
|
Deferred Financing Costs |
Deferred Financing Costs
The Company defers costs incurred to raise debt financing until the related debt is issued, and classifies them as Other Assets. The costs
are amortized into interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt instruments.
|
Deferred Income |
Deferred Income
The Company recorded the net funds received from the Village of Fairmont Nebraska Tax Incremental Financing (“TIF”) as deferred
income and was amortizing $673,000 annually against property tax expense over the life of the process equipment.
|
Revenue Recognition |
Revenue Recognition
Ethanol revenue is recognized when product title and all risk of ownership is transferred to the customer as specified in the contractual
agreements with the marketers. Revenue was previously recognized upon the release of the product for shipment. Under the terms of the new marketing agreements with Gavilon, revenue is recognized when product is loaded into rail cars for shipment.
Revenue from the sale of co-products is recorded when title and all risk of ownership transfers to customers, which generally occurs at the time of shipment. Co-products are generally shipped free on board (“FOB”) shipping point. Interest
income is recognized as earned. In accordance with the Company’s agreements for the marketing and sale of ethanol and related products, commissions due to the marketers are deducted from the gross sale price at the time of payment.
|
Unit Based Compensation |
Unit Based Compensation
The Company uses the estimated market value at the time the units are granted to value those units granted to officers and directors. The
Company records compensation cost on the straight line method over the vesting period. If the units vest upon achievement of a certain milestone, the Company recognizes the expense in the period in which the goal was met.
|
Shipping Costs |
Shipping Costs
Effective August 1, 2012, the Company changed its marketing relationship for ethanol and now records its ethanol sales net of freight
cost. During the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company recorded approximately $28.0 million, $28.0 million, and $12.0 million, respectively, in freight cost as a component of cost of goods sold in the statement of operations
from the sale of ethanol to a different marketer, under which we recorded ethanol sales gross of freight cost.
|
Debt Restructuring Costs |
Debt Restructuring Costs
During the year ended September 30, 2010, ABE South Dakota entered into a troubled debt restructuring agreement with its lenders. See Note 5 for a description of the accounting treatment. ABE
South Dakota incurred legal and professional services fees related to the restructuring of ABE South Dakota debt and has reclassified these costs from selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ending September 30, 2010.
|
Income (Loss) Per Unit |
Income (Loss) Per Unit
Basic and diluted income per unit is computed using the weighted-average number of vested units outstanding during the period. Unit
warrants and unit appreciation rights are considered unit equivalents and are considered in the diluted income-per-unit computation, but unit appreciation rights have not been included in the computations of diluted income (loss) per unit as their
effect would be anti-dilutive. Basic earnings and diluted earnings per unit data were computed as follows (in thousands except per unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for basic earnings per unit
|
|
$ |
(9,767 |
) |
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$ |
31,221 |
|
Increase in fair value of warrant derivative liability
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for diluted earnings per unit
|
|
|
(9,874 |
) |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
31,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic common units outstanding
|
|
|
24,714 |
|
|
|
24,710 |
|
|
|
19,752 |
|
Diluted common units outstanding
|
|
|
24,734 |
|
|
|
24,710 |
|
|
|
19,752 |
|
Earnings per unit basic
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per unit diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Reporting |
Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Based on the related business nature and expected financial results, the Company’s plants are aggregated into one operating
segment.
|
Accounting Estimates |
Accounting Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
Income Taxes |
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be treated as a partnership for tax purposes and generally does not incur income taxes. Instead, the Company’s earnings and losses are included in the income tax returns of
the members. Therefore, no provision or liability for federal or state income taxes has been included in these financial statements. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions. The Company’s
federal income tax returns are open and subject to examination from the 2009 tax return year and forward. Various state income tax returns are generally open from the 2009 and later tax return years based on individual state statute of limitations.
Management has evaluated the Company’s tax positions under the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued guidance on
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes and concluded that the Company has taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustment to the financial statements to comply with the provisions of this guidance.
|
Inventories
Corn, chemicals, supplies, work in process, ethanol and distillers grains inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market.
Deferred Financing Costs
The Company defers costs incurred to raise debt financing until the related debt is issued, and classifies them as Other Assets. The costs
are amortized into interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt instruments.
Receivables
Credit sales are made primarily to a few customers with no collateral required. Trade receivables are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of
all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by regularly evaluating individual receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic
conditions. Receivables are written off if deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received.
Debt Restructuring Costs
During the year ended September 30, 2010, ABE South Dakota entered into a troubled debt restructuring agreement with its lenders. See Note 5 for a description of the accounting treatment. ABE
South Dakota incurred legal and professional services fees related to the restructuring of ABE South Dakota debt and has reclassified these costs from selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ending September 30, 2010.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
3-7 Years |
|
Process equipment
|
|
|
10 Years |
|
Building
|
|
|
40 Years |
|
Maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense as incurred; major improvements and betterments are capitalized. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount on the asset may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows from operations are less than the carrying value of the asset group. An impairment loss is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the asset
exceeds the estimated fair value on that date.
Revenue Recognition
Ethanol revenue is recognized when product title and all risk of ownership is transferred to the customer as specified in the contractual
agreements with the marketers. Revenue was previously recognized upon the release of the product for shipment. Under the terms of the new marketing agreements with Gavilon, revenue is recognized when product is loaded into rail cars for shipment.
Revenue from the sale of co-products is recorded when title and all risk of ownership transfers to customers, which generally occurs at the time of shipment. Co-products are generally shipped free on board (“FOB”) shipping point. Interest
income is recognized as earned. In accordance with the Company’s agreements for the marketing and sale of ethanol and related products, commissions due to the marketers are deducted from the gross sale price at the time of payment.
Segment Reporting
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Based on the related business nature and expected financial results, the Company’s plants are aggregated into one operating
segment.
Unit Based Compensation
The Company uses the estimated market value at the time the units are granted to value those units granted to officers and directors. The
Company records compensation cost on the straight line method over the vesting period. If the units vest upon achievement of a certain milestone, the Company recognizes the expense in the period in which the goal was met.
Income (Loss) Per Unit
Basic and diluted income per unit is computed using the weighted-average number of vested units outstanding during the period. Unit
warrants and unit appreciation rights are considered unit equivalents and are considered in the diluted income-per-unit computation, but unit appreciation rights have not been included in the computations of diluted income (loss) per unit as their
effect would be anti-dilutive. Basic earnings and diluted earnings per unit data were computed as follows (in thousands except per unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for basic earnings per unit
|
|
$ |
(9,767 |
) |
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$ |
31,221 |
|
Increase in fair value of warrant derivative liability
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for diluted earnings per unit
|
|
|
(9,874 |
) |
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
31,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic common units outstanding
|
|
|
24,714 |
|
|
|
24,710 |
|
|
|
19,752 |
|
Diluted common units outstanding
|
|
|
24,734 |
|
|
|
24,710 |
|
|
|
19,752 |
|
Earnings per unit basic
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per unit diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. The Company’s cash balances are maintained in bank depositories and periodically exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced losses in these accounts. The Company segregates cash restricted for debt service and
has classified these funds according to the future anticipated use of the funds.
Derivative Financial Instruments/Due From Broker
On occasion, the Company has entered into derivative contracts to hedge the Company’s exposure to price risk related to forecasted
corn purchases and forecasted ethanol sales. Accounting for derivative contracts requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. If
certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (a) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment, (b) a hedge of the exposure to
variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction, or (c) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign-currency-denominated
forecasted transaction.
Although the Company believes its derivative positions are economic hedges, none have been designated
as a hedge for accounting purposes and derivative positions are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair market value, with changes in fair value recognized in current period earnings.
In addition, certain derivative financial instruments that meet the criteria for derivative accounting treatment also qualify for a scope
exception to derivative accounting, as they are considered normal purchase and sales. The availability of this exception is based on the assumption that the Company has the ability and it is probable that it will deliver or take delivery of the
underlying item. Derivatives that are considered to be normal purchases and sales are exempt from derivative accounting treatment, and are accounted for under accrual accounting.
Shipping Costs
Effective August 1, 2012, the Company changed its marketing relationship for ethanol and now records its ethanol sales net of freight
cost. During the years ended September 30, 2012, 2011, and 2010, the Company recorded approximately $28.0 million, $28.0 million, and $12.0 million, respectively, in freight cost as a component of cost of goods sold in the statement of operations
from the sale of ethanol to a different marketer, under which we recorded ethanol sales gross of freight cost.
Accounting Estimates
Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Deferred Income
The Company recorded the net funds received from the Village of Fairmont Nebraska Tax Incremental Financing (“TIF”) as deferred
income and was amortizing $673,000 annually against property tax expense over the life of the process equipment.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, interest rate swaps, derivative financial instruments, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, warrants, and long-term debt. The fair value of derivative financial instruments is based on quoted market prices, which are considered to be Level 1 inputs. The fair value of warrants is determined
using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is based on Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the long-term debt is based on Level 3 inputs, estimated based on anticipated interest rates which management believes would currently be available to the
Company for similar issues of debt, taking into account the current credit risk of the Company and other market factors. The Company believes the carrying value of the debt instruments at ABE Fairmont approximate fair value. Based on the
restructuring event, the fair value of the debt instruments at ABE South Dakota is not determinable. The fair value of all other financial instruments are estimated to approximate carrying value due to the short-term nature of these instruments, and
are considered to be Level 2 inputs.
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be treated as a partnership for tax purposes and generally does not incur income taxes. Instead, the Company’s earnings and losses are included in the income tax returns of
the members. Therefore, no provision or liability for federal or state income taxes has been included in these financial statements. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions. The Company’s
federal income tax returns are open and subject to examination from the 2009 tax return year and forward. Various state income tax returns are generally open from the 2009 and later tax return years based on individual state statute of limitations.
Management has evaluated the Company’s tax positions under the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued guidance on
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes and concluded that the Company has taken no uncertain tax positions that require adjustment to the financial statements to comply with the provisions of this guidance.
Fair Value Measurements
In determining fair value of its derivative financial instruments and warrant liabilities, the Company uses various methods including
market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often uses certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to
the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three fair value
hierarchy categories:
Level 1: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active markets from readily
available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less-active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained
from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Valuations
incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.
Commodity futures and exchange-traded commodity options contracts are reported at fair value, utilizing Level 1 inputs. For these
contracts, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes and live-trading levels from the Chicago Board of Trade
(“CBOT”) and New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) markets.
The following table summarizes financial
assets and financial liabilities measured at the approximate fair value on September 30, 2012 and 2011, utilized to measure fair value (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Liabilities—Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Other Liabilities—Warrant Derivative
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities—Derivative Financial Instruments
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
832 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Other Liabilities—Warrant Derivative
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
182 |
|
The warrants issued contain a strike price adjustment feature, as described in Note 6. We calculated the fair
value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes valuation model. During the year ended September 30, 2012, we recognized an unrealized gain of $107,000 related to the change in the fair value of the warrant derivative liability. The warrant was
exercised in November 2012.
The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2012(1) |
|
|
September
30, 2011(1) |
|
Market value
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Exercise price
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
45.00 |
% |
|
|
46.92 |
% |
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.230 |
% |
|
|
0.250 |
% |
Forfeiture rate
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Dividend rate
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
(1) |
Market value is based on trading values of comparable competitors. |
The following table
reflects the activity for liabilities measured at fair value, using Level 3 inputs for the year ended September 30, (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Beginning balance of warrant derivative as of October 1,
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Initial recognition of warrant derivative on October 1, 2009
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Unrealized gain related to the change in fair value
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance as of September 30,
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|