Rendering

Component: (Network and Table)
Network
0018 - Disclosure - A. Organization, Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
(http://aols.com/role/A.OrganizationBusinessAndSummaryOfSignificantAccountingPoliciesPolicies)
Table(Implied)
Slicers (applies to each fact value in each table cell)
A. Organization Business And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies PoliciesPeriod [Axis]
2011-10-01 - 2012-09-30
A. Organization Business And Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Policies
 
Basis of Presentation

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Aeolus and its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company uses the equity method to account for its 35.0% ownership interest in CPEC.

  
Use of Estimates

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Such estimates include revenue recognition, warrant liability, allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation and warrant expense. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

  
Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company invests available cash in short-term bank deposits. Cash and cash equivalents include investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair market value at September 30, 2012 and 2011 due to their short-term nature.

 

  
Significant customer and accounts receivable

 

Significant customers and accounts receivable

 

For the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company’s primary customer was BARDA. For the year ended September 30, 2012, revenues from BARDA comprised 100% of total revenues. As of September 30, 2012, the Company’s receivable balances were comprised 100% from this customer. Unbilled accounts receivable, included in accounts receivable, totaling $558,000 as of September 30, 2012 relate to work that has been performed, though invoicing has not yet occurred. All of the unbilled receivables are expected to be billed and collected within the next 12 months. Accounts receivable are stated at invoice amounts and consist primarily of amounts due from HHS as well as amounts due under reimbursement contracts with other government entities and non-government and philanthropic organizations. If necessary, the Company records a provision for doubtful receivables to allow for any amounts which may be unrecoverable. This provision is based upon an analysis of the Company’s prior collection experience, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, an allowance for doubtful accounts was not recorded as the collection history from the Company’s customers indicated that collection was probable.

  
Concentrations of credit risk

 

Concentrations of credit risk

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions. Management believes that the financial risks associated with its cash and cash equivalents and investments are minimal. Because accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due from the U.S. federal government agencies, management deems there to be minimal credit risk.

  
Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Aeolus recognizes revenue in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition.  Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery (or passage of title) has occurred or services have been rendered, (iii) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.  

 

The BARDA Contract is classified as a “cost-plus-fixed-fee” contract. Aeolus recognizes government contract revenue in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition including the authoritative guidance specific to federal government contracts. Reimbursable costs under the contract primarily include direct labor, subcontract costs, materials, equipment, travel, and indirect costs. In addition, we receive a fixed fee under the BARDA Contract, which is unconditionally earned as allowable costs are incurred and is not contingent on success factors. Reimbursable costs under this BARDA Contract, including the fixed fee, are generally recognized as revenue in the period the reimbursable costs are incurred and become billable.

  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts of our short-term financial instruments, which include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.

  
Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.

 

ASC 820 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The Company utilizes the market approach. The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

 

· Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
· Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

 

· Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

 

The warrant liability is measured at fair market value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and 2011 and is summarized below (in thousands):

 

Fair value at September 30, 2012     Fair value at September 30, 2011  
Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
$     $     $ 19,319     $     $     $ 23,405  
                                             

 

The following table summarizes, as of September 30, 2012, the warrant activity subject to Level 3 inputs which are measured on a recurring basis:

 

Fair value measurements of warrants using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)  
Balance at September 30, 2011   $ 23,405  
Warrants exercised     (17 )
Change in fair value of warrant liability     (4,069 )
Balance at September 30, 2012   $ 19,319  

  
Research and Development

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development costs are expensed in the period incurred.

  
Leases

 

Leases

 

The Company leases office space and office equipment under month to month operating lease agreements. For the years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, total rent expense was approximately $36,000 and $18,000, respectively.

  
Income Taxes

 

Income Taxes

 

 The Company recognizes liabilities or assets for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. These temporary differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of the assets or liabilities are recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is established when management determines that is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management evaluates the Company’s ability to realize its net deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and valuation allowances are provided, as necessary. During this evaluation, management reviews its forecasts of income in conjunction with other positive and negative evidence surrounding the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets to determine  if a valuation allowance is required. Adjustments to the valuation allowance will increase or decrease the Company’s income tax provision or benefit. Management also applies the relevant guidance to determine the amount of income tax expense or benefit to be allocated among continuing operations, discontinued operations, and items charged or credited directly to stockholders’ equity (deficit).

 

A tax position must meet a minimum probability threshold before a financial statement benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold is a tax position that is more likely than not be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation process, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

  
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

 

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

 

The Company computes basic net income (loss) per weighted average share attributable to common stockholders using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company computes diluted net income (loss) per weighted average share attributable to common stockholders using the weighted average number of shares of common and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares outstanding consist of stock options, convertible debt, warrants and convertible preferred stock using the treasury stock method and are excluded if their effect is anti-dilutive. Diluted weighted average common shares included incremental shares of approximately 11,156,000 and 22,828,000 shares for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 issuable upon the exercise or conversion of convertible debt, stock options to purchase common stock, convertible preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock. Diluted weighted average common shares excluded incremental shares of approximately 61,847,000 and 48,577,000, respectively, for the fiscal year 2012 and 2011, due to their anti-dilutive effect.

 

    Fiscal year ended September 30,  
      2012       2011  
Numerator:                
Net income (loss)   $ 1,698     $ 299  
                 
Denominator:                
Weighted-average number of shares – basic     61,593       59,474  
Dilutive securities – equity awards     11,156       22,828  
Weighted-average number of shares – diluted     72,749       82,302  
                 
Earnings per share – basic   $ 0.03     $ 0.01  
Earnings per share – diluted   $ 0.02     $ 0.00  

  
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

 

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company recognizes stock based compensation expense in the statement of operations based upon the fair value of the equity award amortized over the vesting period.

  
Segment Reporting

 

Segment Reporting

 

The Company currently operates in one segment.

  
Warrant Liability

 

Warrant Liability

 

 The Company has warrants with an embedded feature that do not meet the requirements of derivative accounting per Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815. The Company records these warrants at their fair value in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

 

Increases or decreases in fair value of the warrants are included as a component of other income (expense) in the accompanying statement of operations for the respective period. As of September 30, 2012, the liability for warrants decreased to approximately $19,319,000 from approximately $23,405,000 as of September 30, 2011, as a result of warrant exercises of $17,000 and a gain to the statements of operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 of approximately $4,069,000. The warrant liability and revaluations have not and will not have any impact on the Company’s working capital, liquidity or business operations. Some of the Company's warrants contain terms that limit the number of shares the Company would be required to issue thereunder unless the warrant holder agrees to increase the limit prior to exercise. If the warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2012 were exercised in full without regard to any current exercise limits contained therein, the Company would be required to issue a maximum of 59,149,999 shares of common stock.